Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 4, 1926No. 17489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeth, J.

“After a general term of the superior court has been organized by the presiding judge and put into operation, the term continues until finally adjourned by the presiding judge or by the operation of some provision of law. In King v. Sears, 91 Ga. 577 (18 S. E. 830), and Hines v. McLellan, 117 Ga. 845 (45 S. E. 279), the court took a recess until a fixed date, and it was held that this did not end the term, but it continued in the interval; and this was the ruling in the former case, although in such interval a term of court was held in another county of the circuit.” Liverpool &c. Ins. Co. v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. SearsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Hines v. McLellanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Morehead v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Luke v. LukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Holliday v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API