Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Allen
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 17, 1984No. 83SA60PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSHBAUM, Justice.
Objectors, minority shareholders in two mutual ditch companies, appeal a final decree entered by the district court for Water Division No. 2 approving an application for a change of water rights. We affirm, but remand with directions to amend the decree.
I
The Las Animas Consolidated Canal Company (Consolidated) is a mutual ditch company serving the irrigating needs of its shareholders on two ditches, the Consolidated or Riverside Ditch and the Jones Ditch. The Consolidated Extension Canal Company (Extension) is a mutual ditch company serving the irrigating needs of its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Brighton Ditch Co. v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Jacobucci v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Brown v. GurneySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Rowe v. Watered Down FarmsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- May v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Park County Sportsmen's Ranch LLP v. BargasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Board of Water Works of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Front Range Res., LLC v. Colo. Ground Water Comm'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.