Stanford v. State

BRETT, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Bob Nila Stanford, who will hereinafter be referred to as de fendant, was charged by information filed in the district court of Tulsa County with the crime of second degree burglary, by breaking and entering, after former conviction of a felony; was tried, convicted and his punishment fixed at IS years in the state penitentiary.

Defendant perfected his appeal to this court within due time, and now advances two assignments of error upon which he relies for modification or reversal:

“1. By reception into evidence of testimony implying that the defendant had…