Legal Opinion

Padilla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1993No. 92-2299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant first argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court illegally sentenced him as an adult because the court did not follow the statutorily mandated procedure set forth in section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1991). We agree and reverse.

The statute applies in all instances where a child has been found to violate the law; it does not distinguish between misdemeanor and felony offenses. Section 39.059(7) requires the trial court to order a predisposition report prior to sentencing and section 39.059(7)(c) lists six (6) criteria that must be reviewed prior to sentencing. Failure to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RhodenSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Denmark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Cheatham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Bradley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Schotsch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API