Legal Opinion

Holden v. Nevergall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 26, 1988No. 5-87-0201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HARRISON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, George and Waunetta Holden, brought suit on a promissory note seeking recovery for principal, interest, and attorney fees. The defendant, Gayle Loar, the daughter of the plaintiffs, raised the defense of usury and counterclaimed for the statutory penalty for usury under section 6 of the Interest Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 17, par. 6413). The circuit court of Marion County tried this cause on December 2, 1986. On February 19, 1987, the circuit court found that the parties had entered into a usurious contract, but it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. MontaleoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Rogus v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Sidney M. Massie, Individually, and Sidney M. Massie, as Executive Officer and Trustee of Massie Development Company v. Rose RubinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. Cohn v. Receivables Finance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. JensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrews v. CramerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Lane v. FabertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Lane v. FabertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API