Legal Opinion

Kahre-Richards Family Foundation, Inc. v. Village of Baldwinsville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: The trial court erred in holding that actual receipt of a notice to redeem by a real property owner is required for compliance with RPTL 1464 (1). Because defendant Robroy’s certified mailing of the notice to redeem to plaintiffs complied with RPTL 1464 (1) and is a method "reasonably calculated” to apprise the property owners in this tax foreclosure proceeding of their right to redeem their property, the requirements of due process have been met (see, Harville v County of Erie, 148 AD2d 954). (Appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harville v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Facchin v. PekichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API