Legal Opinion

Pope v. Remisa

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 29, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

Defendants appeal from a Superior Court, York County, acceptance of a Referee’s Report finding public and private easements by prescription over defendants’ property and assessing costs. We sustain their appeal.

FACTS

Wharf Lane Extension is a way running north along defendants’ property in Ogun-quit and terminating in a Y-shaped fork at its northern outlet onto Beach Street, a public road. Plaintiffs’ properties abut the way’s western border. Since at least 1946, defendants had maintained a fence along the way’s eastern boundary. In 1981, defendants erected two new fences:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boothbay Harbor Condominiums, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Calthorpe v. AbrahamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Thornton v. Estate of CresseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Newell v. StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKinley v. McKinleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Aalberg v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API