Legal Opinion · Dissent
Duke v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 17, 1968No. 354Published
1Dissent
MOORE, Justice.
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. The only instrument signed by the appellant was a simple application for credit. The application simply stated that:
“In consideration of your selling merchandise to me on Sears revolving CHARGE ACCOUNT, I agree to the following regarding all purchases made by me or on my Sears revolving CHARGE ACCOUNT identification:”
(The application then sets forth certain terms and conditions with respect to the amount of monthly payments, together with a schedule of any interest charges thereon.)
I agree to the statement in the majority…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lit Bros. v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Thomas v. Central Charge Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965