Legal Opinion

Wingard v. Heinkel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1967No. 38642PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunter, J. —

This appeal arises from an equitable action for money had and received, instituted by Leo L. Wingard, plaintiff (appellant), against Pierce County, defendant (respondent), in September, 1964. An alternative claim was made to quiet title to certain real property in Pierce County, but this portion of the complaint was abandoned at trial. George and Louise Heinkel, record owners of the property in question, were thereafter dismissed.

The facts of this case are as follows: On December 1, 1961, the plaintiff purchased what he thought was the Heinkel property at public auction for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kupka v. ReidWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Anderson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Matthews v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Pierce County v. NewbeginWashington Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brower v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Proceedings of King County Foreclosure of LiensWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Schultz v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Pierce County v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Carlson v. StairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API