Legal Opinion

Stigleman v. Felter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1919No. 9,717PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Clinton Circuit Court; Henry II. Vinton, Special Judge. Action between Wiley S. Felter and Walter Stigleman and others. From an order overruling a motion of the latter parties to correct nunc pro tunc the record of a judgment in the cause, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

This is an appeal from the action of the Clinton Circuit Court in overruling the motion of appellants to correct, nunc pro tunc, the record of a judgment rendered in that court almost two years before the motion in question was filed.

The transcript shows that notice of the time of filing and of the presentation of said motion was duly served upon appellee, and that he was present in court at said time by counsel.

1. The courts have the undoubted right to entertain such motions, when properly presented, but it has been uniformly held in this state that such motions must be founded upon some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sidener v. CoonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Pritchard v. MinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Freestone v. State Ex Rel. Advance-Rumely Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API