Legal Opinion

Compton v. Romans

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1993No. 92-SC-566-DGPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

We revisit the rule of absolute immunity for high-ranking governmental officials who are found to have committed libel with malice or in reckless disregard for the truth when such arises out of the performance of their statutory duties; thereby denying citizens recovery of damages for injury to their good names and reputations. This Court has long recognized the desirability of granting certain high-ranking officials absolute immunity, not as an emolument or perquisite of office or for their personal protection, but to prevent timid, weak and vacillating performance of public…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Kentucky State Racing Commission v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  4. Tanner v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. McAlister Company v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Kentucky Lottery Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. McCollum v. GarrettKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Belcher v. Kentucky Parole BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
  4. Matthews v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
  5. Compton v. RomansKentucky Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API