Tingle v. Tingle
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 34 — MOTION IN COUNTY COURT APPEAL EROM HENRY CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Civil Code, section 20. 3 Met. 62. 14 B. Mon. 340. 3 Met. 167.' 5 J. J. Mar. 220. 5 Dana, 29. 5 J. J. Mar. 9. CITED General Statutes, chap. 94, art, 1, secs. 2, 7, 11. General Statutes, chap. 96, art. 2, sec. 5. General Statutes, chap. 21, sec. 3. General Statutes, chap. 110, see. 15. 3 Met. 71, Phillips v. Tucker. 1 Bibb, 265, Brown v. McConnell. 3 Mar. 330, Finley v. Hayden. 1 Mar. 212, Bratton v.…
Read the full summary
Case 34 — MOTION IN COUNTY COURT APPEAL EROM HENRY CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Civil Code, section 20. 3 Met. 62. 14 B. Mon. 340. 3 Met. 167.' 5 J. J. Mar. 220. 5 Dana, 29. 5 J. J. Mar. 9. CITED General Statutes, chap. 94, art, 1, secs. 2, 7, 11. General Statutes, chap. 96, art. 2, sec. 5. General Statutes, chap. 21, sec. 3. General Statutes, chap. 110, see. 15. 3 Met. 71, Phillips v. Tucker. 1 Bibb, 265, Brown v. McConnell. 3 Mar. 330, Finley v. Hayden. 1 Mar. 212, Bratton v. Bryan. 8 Bush, 105, Dunean v. Mayor of Louisville. 2 Mar. 23. 4 Litt. 328. 14 B. Mon. 339, Wood v. Campbell. 10 Bush, 476,…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Peters
This was a proceeding commenced in the Henry County Court by the appellee to obtain an alteration of the location of a part of a public road in that county. The proposed alteration passes over the land of the appellant, and also of several other persons, all of whom consent to the change and have released the right of way.
The viewers appointed made a report, which, on exceptions filed by the appellant, was adjudged bad, and leave was given to the viewers to amend their report, which was done; but only two of the three viewers signed the amended report.
The appellant excepted to the amended…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Phillips v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gratzer v. GertisenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Story v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909