Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Prickett

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1933No. 4279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

The only error requiring consideration, presented by the record, is the weight of the evidence.

The plaintiff testified that he was going to school on skates and, “That is all I know.” This is not strange, since his skull was crushed and some of the tissues of the brain covering exuded.

Robert Richen, a boy fifteen years of age, gave an account of the happening. He states:

“I was about twenty or thirty feet from where it happened and I was going to school, and Melvin was coming up the street on his skates and when he got to where this dog was this dog just sort of run out…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knoblauch v. CoufalCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API