Legal Opinion

Prunty v. Tate, Unpublished Decision (12-15-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1999No. CA No. 99-BA-30Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

This cause arises as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus whereby Petitioner alleges he is wrongfully incarcerated by the Respondent and the State of Ohio.

The facts indicated that Petitioner originally pled guilty to two counts of arson and was given a suspended sentence. After violation of his community controlled sanctions, Petitioner was sentenced to serve one year for arson in violation of R.C.2909.03 (F) (3) concurrent with fifteen months for Arson in violation of R.C. 2903.03 (F) (4).

On June 1, 1999, Petitioner filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stahl v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Smith v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Thomas v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API