Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Wilson Township

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 2003No. CX-02-600PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Casey Catherine Peterson, the appellant and judgment creditor, brought this garnishment action to force Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company, the respondent and garnishee, to indemnify its insured, Wilson Township, the respondent and judgment debtor. The court of appeals held that subsequent garnishment actions against a garnishee are impermissible after the garnishee has been discharged under Minn.Stat. § 571.79(b) (1998). We reverse.

On June 23, 1996, Lance Henderson was sold and served a number of alcoholic beverages while attending Wilson Daze, an annual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Ceridian Corporation v. Scsc CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Wilson TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allianz Insurance Company Of Canada v. Richard SanftlebenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Residential Funding Co. v. HSBC Mortgage Corp. (In re Residential Capital, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41755Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. Allianz Ins. Co. v. Richard SanftlebenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API