Legal Opinion
Hushion v. McBride
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 9, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The individual defendants James E. McBride and Margaret A. McBride, hereinafter called simply the defendants, are husband and wife. He is financially irresponsible. In 1933 they promoted a distilling corporation. The master finds: “All the cash which ever went into the enterprise was the money of Margaret A. McBride, invested by her in part for the purpose of making her husband, James E. McBride, the executive of an industry, and in part as an investment for pecuniary returns. By virtue of the fact that the McBrides were furnishing all the money, they controlled the whole promotion of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Abbott v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Cole v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Mansfield v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Saxon Theatre Corp. of Boston v. SageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Stern v. LiebermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- City of Revere v. BlausteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Ross v. Colonial Provision Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.