Legal Opinion

Herrera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 2013No. 4D13-864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion without prejudice for her to file a facially sufficient motion if she can do so in good faith. Within sixty (60) days of the mandate for this case, appellant may file an amended motion in the trial court which complies with the pleading requirements set forth in Cano v. State, 112 So.3d 646, 648 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Lorena Vargas Herrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014