ESTATE of SR CRIM v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Justice.
Condemnation efforts by Wilbarger County and the State of Texas under the power of eminent domain constitutes the subject matter of this suit.
The first instrument filed by the condemning authorities to take the property in Wilbarger County for state highway purposes described the owner of such lands as “Boyd Barjenbruch, Independent Executor of Will of Estate of S. R. Crim, Deceased, who resides in Montague County, Texas.” There is not any other instrument alleging any other owner. The suit was styled “State of Texas et al vs. Estate of S. R. Crim, Dec’d.” None of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Houston v. KunzeTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Vey v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Parks v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. Clajon Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Maberry v. Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Horton v. County of MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Walling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Matador Pipelines, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.