Legal Opinion

McDonough v. Mancuso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This appeal is from a deficiency judgment in a mortgage foreclosure. The appellants Morris Goldblatt and his wife Rebecca were the grantees in a deed by which they assumed the payment of the mortgage foreclosed. They were mesne grantees between the owner at the time of the execution of the mortgage and the defendant owning the equity of redemption at the time of the foreclosure. Their liability was as sureties. (Calvo v. Davies, 73 N. Y. 211; Paine v. Jones, 76 id. 274.) They claim to be exonerated and released because of an agreement between their grantee Mancuso, who had assumed the payment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. St John's College v. . &198tna Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Harris v. . ShorallNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Savings Bank v. Ritchey Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Rosenfeld v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API