Legal Opinion · Dissent

Curry v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2016No. DA 14-0529Published

1DissentJustice McKINNON

¶76 I respectfully dissent from the Court’s opinion. I would reverse the Water Court’s opinion regarding Pondera’s annual irrigation and place of use. I would affirm the Water Master’s finding limiting Pondera’s annual irrigation to 56,556 acres. I would affirm the Water Master’s finding limiting Pondera’s place of use to the approximately 85,000 acres described on the share certificates. I would reinstate the Water Master’s order requiring Pondera to comply with Curry’s discovery request to produce the share certificates.

I

¶77 The standard adage teaches us that “hard cases make bad law.”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Edgewater Hospital, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Department of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State, Dept. of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API