Legal Opinion
Carrigan v. Roussell
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 14, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
177 N.J. Super. 272 (1981)
426 A.2d 517
SALLY CARRIGAN AND HER HUSBAND, KEVIN CARRIGAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MAURICE ROUSSELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted December 9, 1980.
Decided January 14, 1981.
Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.
Campbell, Foley, Lee, Murphy & Cernigliaro, for appellants (Stephen J. Foley, on the brief).
Harry R. Burton, for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.
This is a personal injury action by plaintiff Sally Carrigan, with a derivative claim by her husband Kevin Carrigan, arising out of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Robinson v. MedingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Outlaw v. Bituminous Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Toohey v. WebsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Jenks v. McGranaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Thomas v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MolinaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Crawn v. CampoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Schick v. FerolitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Ludwikoski v. KurotsuDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Schick v. FerolitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.