Anderson v. Commonwealth

ANNUNZIATA, Judge.

Following a bench trial, appellant, Carl E. Anderson, was convicted of DUI, third offense, and operating a motor vehicle after having been adjudicated an habitual offender. On ap*28peal, he contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the certificate of breath analysis and the order adjudicating him an habitual offender. We disagree and affirm his convictions.

I

The facts are not in dispute. On August 16, 1995, Officer VanLandingham stopped appellant after observing him make an illegal left turn. The officer detected an odor of alcohol about appellant and noticed…