Legal Opinion
Groner v. Cavender
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1931No. 3790PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGREGOR, J.
The plaintiff brings this suit in the form of a concursus proceeding under the provisions of Act No. 139 of 1922. There was a written contract between Morris Groner, plaintiff, and R. J. Cavender, defendant, dated May 18, 1926, wherein the defendant contracted to remodel certain premises for the plaintiff at 444 Stoner avenue in the city of Shreveport, for the contract price of $4,679.56. This contract was based on written plans and specifications, both of which were very loosely drawn. In the specifications there ' is indicated the following stipulations:
“* * * Should alterations be suggest-…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Canal Co. v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Becker v. BeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- In re the Application to Confirm an Assessment for the Construction of a Sewer in the PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Monarch & Kaiser v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
- Pontiac Buggy Co. v. SkinnerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Pelican Elec. Contractors v. NeumeyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Pamper Corporation v. Town of MarksvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Master Maintenance Engineering, Inc. v. McManusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Roff v. Southern Construction CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.