Legal Opinion
Sherrell v. Kelso
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided February 23, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 623PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*Supp. 26Opinion
FITCH, J.
Statement of Issues
Four issues are presented to us on this appeal.
First, was it error to allow portions of a vehicle accident report to be read into evidence by a police officer? The question of whether or not this would constitute prejudicial error is one we do not reach, because we have determined that the introduction of the evidence was not error in the first instance.1
Second, did the trial court commit prejudicial error by admitting, over plaintiiFs objection, a hearsay statement of the witness Lillian Pearl?
Third, did the trial court commit prejudicial error by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robinson v. CableCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Anderson v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Carroll v. BeaversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Box v. California Date Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gonzalez v. The Vapor Trail CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Soulliere v. Suzuki Motor Corp. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020