Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'neal, Etc. v. Estate of Grace, Etc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1961No. 29,793Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Jackson, J.

I dissent from the majority action in dismissing the appeal herein for two reasons. One, *248that in my opinion this appeal should have been in the Appellate Court. See: Dept. St. Rev., Ink. Tax Div. v. Short, Admx. etc. (1955), 234 Ind. 417, 127 N. E. 2d 341.

The other is that in view of the circumstances this case should be decided on the merits rather than be summarily dismissed for failure to comply with a rule that exists only to expedite the work of the court and was not intended to be jurisdictional or to work any hardship on the litigants.

Note. — Reported in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'neal, Etc. v. Estate of Grace, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dept. St. Rev., Inh. Tax Div. v. SHORT, ADMX., ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API