Legal Opinion

Ripley v. Schenck

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 27, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant's bill is to foreclose a mortgage given to secure a bond in the principal sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000), with interest at five per cent. Both bond and mortgage were made by defendant Schenck (his wife, also a defendant, joining in the mortgage) to complainant's assignor, in 1905, payable one year thereafter.

In 1906 the mortgaged premises were sold for unpaid taxes for the year 1905, and were bought in by the township. In 1916 complainant took an assignment of the bond and mortgage, and made agreement with defendant mortgagors that the interest rate should thereafter be six…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tully v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  2. Farmer v. WardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koch v. Kiron State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. Schorr v. Jacob Ellis RealtiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Barry, Inc. v. Baf, LimitedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Camden Trust Co. v. HandleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  5. Junge v. HuttonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API