Legal Opinion
Aetna Insurance v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 24, 1955No. Nos. KC 269, 391PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOTT, Chief Judge.
These two cases involve the same parties, arise from the same transactions and will be considered together. In No. KC-269, filed December 2, 1952, a declaratory judgment is sought: (1) that the court declare the plaintiffs are not liable to the defendant under a contract of insurance; and (2) that the defendant be restrained from maintaining any action against the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are forty-seven insurance companies, incorporated under the laws of states other than Kansas, the defendant being a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware. No. KC-391 is…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aetna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- SW Industries, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1987
- Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. JEPPESON & COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1972
- Aetna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Old Colony Insurance v. M-P Cotton Felt Co. of Mississippi, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964