Legal Opinion
Beiswenger Enterprises Corp. v. Carletta
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 13, 1991No. 91-149-CIV-T-17PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the following:
1. Motion to Strike Pleadings, Dkt. 16.
2. Motion to Strike Pleadings, Dkt. 17.
3. Response to Motion to Strike Pleadings, Dkt. 20.
4. Response to Motion to Strike Pleadings, Dkt. 21.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Motions to strike on the grounds of insufficiency, immateriality, irrelevancy, and redundancy are not favored, often being considered “time wasters”, and will usually be denied unless the allegations have no possible relation to the controversy and may cause prejudice to one of the parties. Poston v. American…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Karen Renee Augustus, a Minor, by Charles A. Augustus, Her Father, and Next Friend v. The Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Georgia Department of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995