Legal Opinion

Vinson v. Augusta Roofing & Metal Works

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1949No. 32311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

Were the defendant’s alleged acts of negli gence the proximate cause, or one of the concurring proximate causes, of the injuries complained of? The answer to this question is determinative of whether the general demurrer should have been sustained. Reid’s Branson on Instructions to Juries, Vol. 2, 130, § 335, quotes with approval the following definition of proximate cause in Cochran v. Kendrick, 43 Ga. App. 135, 142 (158 S. E. 57): “If in a given case the injuries complained of did not flow naturally and directly from the wrongful act or omission attributed to the defendant or could not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Thomas v. Georgia Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Roberts v. EasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Cochran v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. AmersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Davis v. City of ToccoaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API