Legal Opinion

Graves v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1884PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

The defendant, as a common carrier, received at Peoria, Illinois, seventy-five barrels of high wines, and agreed to deliver them to the plaintiffs at Boston, in this Commonwealth. The bill of lading contained the stipulation that the goods were “ shipped at an agreed valuation of $20 per bbl., owner’s risk of leakage.” It also contained the agreement, that, “ in the event of the loss of any property for which responsibility attaches under this bill of lading to the carriers, the value or cost of the same at the time and point of shipment is to govern the settlement, except the value of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. FraloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Magnin v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Dunlap v. International Steamboat Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Hart v. Pennsylvania R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1881

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Calderon v. Atlas Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Railway Co. v. WynnTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Donlon Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Coupland v. Housatonic R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1892

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API