Legal Opinion

Jaeger v. Glover

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1903No. Nos. 13,537—(109)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Harrison, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $837.50.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Plaintiffs, a firm of real-estate brokers in Minneapolis, seek to recover commissions from defendant for securing a purchaser of valuable property listed with them for sale. The action was tried to a jury. There was a verdict for plaintiffs for the amount claimed. This appeal is from an order denying a new trial.

Plaintiffs’ services were rendered under a written contract, wherein it was agreed that they were to find a purchaser for the property, and were to have the exclusive agency until January 13, 1902 (six months from date), and were to sell the property for $8,000, one-half cash, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Fairchild v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Putnam v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. KnobelNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bossart v. Erie Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Everson v. PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Steidl v. McClymondsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API