Legal Opinion

Small v. Chronicle & Gazette Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 6, 1950No. 3921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

Whether justice requires that a new trial should be had upon the ground of newly discovered evidence is a question of fact for the Trial Court. McGinley v. Railroad, 79 N. H. 320, 321; Jackson v. Smart, 89 N. H. 457, 458; State v. Long, 90 N. H. 103, 107. However “it is always the duty of this court to determine as a matter of law whether the evidence on which the trial justice has based his findings is such that those findings can reasonably be made.” State v. Long, Id.; Roy v. Chalifoux, 95 N. H. 321, 324.

To authorize the finding that a new trial should be granted under the provisions of R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bausewine v. Norristown Herald, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Sessmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Curley v. Curtis Pub. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. MallarSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Sylvain v. Estate of SylvainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API