Small v. Chronicle & Gazette Publishing Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Whether justice requires that a new trial should be had upon the ground of newly discovered evidence is a question of fact for the Trial Court. McGinley v. Railroad, 79 N. H. 320, 321; Jackson v. Smart, 89 N. H. 457, 458; State v. Long, 90 N. H. 103, 107. However “it is always the duty of this court to determine as a matter of law whether the evidence on which the trial justice has based his findings is such that those findings can reasonably be made.” State v. Long, Id.; Roy v. Chalifoux, 95 N. H. 321, 324.
To authorize the finding that a new trial should be granted under the provisions of R.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bausewine v. Norristown Herald, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Sessmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Curley v. Curtis Pub. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. MallarSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Sylvain v. Estate of SylvainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977