Legal Opinion
Karlin v. Reed
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 27, 1978No. 77-1082PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by the Government from an order which released Captain Kar-lin, an Air Force Reserve officer, from his obligations to go on active duty.
Under a voluntary program known as the Berry Plan, Captain Karlin was commissioned in the Air Force Reserve and thereby obtained a draft deferment so he could finish his medical residency. This Berry Plan provided that the armed services could select draftable interns for the program after considering the future needs of the services. 32 C.F.R. 58.3(a)(3). Upon selection the individuals were deferred, but they agreed to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Sammy Salamy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Joseph P. Ornato v. Martin Hoffman, Secretary of the Army and Commanding Officer, Reserve Components PersonnelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Donald S. Roth v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 598, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,223 Roger W. Rich v. Secretary of the Army, Major General Kenneth R. Dirks, M.D., Former Commander Philip A. Deffer, M.D., Brigadier GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- William Daniel Nicholson, Iii, Cross-Appellant v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Rich v. Secretary of ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Miller v. ClaytorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Karlin v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978