Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1934No. 8 Div. 484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit was for forcible entry and unlawful detainer, and unlawful detainer. The defendants pleaded the general issue.

In order for plaintiff to recover under either count, he must show that he was in pri- or possession of the land — a prior possession to the inception of defendants’ forcible entry without authority — “wrongful possession of the defendant(s) * * * prior to the beginning of the unlawful détainer.” Whaley v. Wynn, 208 Ala. 342, 95 So. 16, 17; Nicrosi v. Phillipi, 91 Ala. 299, 8 So. 561; Beck v. Glenn, 69 Ala. 121.

The evidence showed that plaintiff, Lipscomb,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Nicrosi v. PhillipiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Posey v. PressleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Beck v. GlennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Knowles v. OgletreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bice v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API