Commonwealth Ex Rel. School District v. Bey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Appellants, 1 husband and wife, were convicted in a summary proceeding before an alderman and on appeal in the court below of violating the compulsory attendance provisions of the School Code.
The offense was committed on January 19, 1949, and the applicable statute is the Act of May 18, 1911, P. L. 309, §1414, as last amended by the Act of June 24,1939, P. L. 786, §2, 24 PS §1421. It requires “every parent ... of any child or children of compulsoi’y school age [between the ages of eight and seventeen years] ... to send such child or children to a day school . . .; and such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Teachers' Tenure Act CasesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Exparte CrouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Meyerkorth v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- Commonwealth v. BeilerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- State v. GarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Scoma v. Chicago Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.