Legal Opinion

Albert v. Gus Juengling & Son Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1926No. 19258 and 19259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

These two cases may be disposed of in one opinion. In each case plaintiff in error was summarily fined $100, by reason, as found by the court, of having violated an injunction issued by the court in a case in which neither of the plaintiffs in error was a party. The findings and judgment of the trial court against these plaintiffs in error were made and entered at the close of a hearing in which two other parties had been tried for contempt in violating the same injunctive order of the court. Both these parties were acquitted of the charge. One of these persons so acquitted was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sawbrook Steel Castings Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Sawbrook Steel Castings Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API