Legal Opinion

Ejnes v. Carinthia Trailside Associates

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 1, 1989No. 88-143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

This case involves the construction of a termination clause of a purchase-and-sale agreement. The defendants in the trial court were Carinthia Trailside Associates, a limited partnership, and Donald Swain, a general partner of Carinthia. *356The plaintiffs were persons who signed agreements with defendant Carinthia (signed by defendant Swain) to purchase condominium units. Relying on a stipulation of facts, defendants moved for summary judgment, pursuant to V.R.C.P. 56, of . plaintiffs’ claims for return of their deposits because the condominium purchase did not go through. The trial court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. Price v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Digregorio v. Champlain Valley Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  4. Evarts v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. Agway, Inc. v. MarottiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamelin v. Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. O'Brien v. SynnottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Lopez v. Concord General Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Hamelin v. Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API