Legal Opinion

Everhardt v. United States Investment & Redemption Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1901Published

1Opinion of the CourtRufus B. Smith, J.

This action is brought by the holder of a certificate of debenture issued by the defendant company, for which he paid six (6) dollars. E. H. Kuhlman, another certificate holder of a similar character, who paid $192-50, having been made a party, has filed an intervening petition asking the same relief as the plaintiff.

By consent of the parties to the action it was referred to Mr. A. B. Benedict as referee to ascertain and determine the facts and the law, and report the same to this court.

The referee has filed what has been called a “partial report,” which I set out in full in this opinion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. BartolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Harrison v. Cotton States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API