Rountree v. . Rountree
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
On the hearing the matter was properly made to turn on whether the paper writing, which has been probated in common form as the last will and testament of Albert E. Rountree, deceased, is sufficient in character and substance to constitute his will. The trial court ruled in favor of its sufficiency on authority of Wise v. Short, 181 N. C., 320, 107 S. E., 134. With this we agree.
A paper writing which bears upon its face, as the present instrument does, the animus testandi of the maker will be declared his will as a matter of law. In re Will of Rowland, 206 N. C., 456, 174 S. E., 284; In re…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Outlaw v. . Hurdle and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
- Spencer v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- In Re BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- In Re Will of JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- In Re Will of RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Will of MucciSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- In Re Will of MucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- In Re Will of MucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975