Young v. Duhme & Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 9 — PETITION ORDINARY cited 1 Rev. Stat.,page 500, sec. 16; 5 Mon., 101; 18 B. Mon., 209; 2 Rev. Slat., page 10, sec. 3; lb., page 133, sec. 6. cited 2 Rev. Stat., 133. cited 18 B. Mon., 209; 8 Dana, 186; 8 B. Mon., 508; Act o/" 1851, 2 Rev. Slat., 133; 2 Slat. Law, 1147; Civil Code, secs. 126, 128; 5 Dana, 411; lb., 507; 3 Dana, 392; 7 Dana, 264-5; 6 J. J. Mar., 228; 3 J. J. Mar., 633; 3 Mon., 356; 5 Mon., 20; 4 J. J. Mar., 50; 7 lb., 189; 9 Dana, 428.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion op the court:
Upon this record two appeals are prosecuted, from two distinct judgments against the same parties.
The first one is from a judgment rendered in favor of the appellees against appellants, in an action brought in the court below, upon certain notes executed by Bushnell Willey in his life time, to them, and upon an account for articles sold to said Willey by E. Hill, and by Hill assigned to appellees.
From the allegations of the petition in the first case it appears that said Willey, who was a citizen of Harrison county, Ky., at the time, died in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pilkington's v. Gaunt's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
- Stroud's Heirs v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stewart, from Decision of the Judge of ProbateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1868
- Craddock v. PaytonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902