Legal Opinion
Conoco Pipeline v. Oneok, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1996No. 95-6095, 95-6118PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Mr. Don E. Moore and Ms. Connie J. Moore brought this action alleging their property was polluted by Conoco, Inc. and Conoco Pipe Line Co. 1 The Moores alleged that Conoco owned and operated a pipeline which broke and spilled gasoline and fuel oil into nearby soil and ground water. Conoco brought a third-party action against ONEOK, Inc., d/b/a Oklahoma Natural Gas Company (ONG), alleging that the leak was caused by the installation of an ONG pipeline on top of the Conoco pipeline, and seeking damages for the Moore claim and for state-ordered remediation costs. Conoco…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert M. McKinney v. Gannett Co., Inc., and the New Mexican, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Mistletoe Express Service, Inc. v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Ofelia SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- J.I. Case Credit Corporation v. Bobby Crites, and Rodney TimmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Holland v. Dolese Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conoco Incorporated v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Munoz v. John Doe CorporationsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022