Rice v. Simmons
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Garland Chancery Court; Alphonso Curl, Chancellor; The court had no jurisdiction to render judgment by default until it had passed upon the motion of defendant. 15 Colo. 372; 28 111. 317; 20 la. 138; 8 Colo. 188; 9 Id. 597; 15 Id. 372.
1Opinion of the Court
Frauiínthau, J.
On April 15, 1908, the appellees filed their complaint in the Garland Chancery Court seeking to recover a judgment against appellant on certain notes and to have same decreed to be a vendor’s lien on real estate. The notes were set out in the complaint, and copies thereof were attached thereto as exhibits at the time of the filing of the complaint. Summons was issued thereon, and service thereof made on defendant for the time and in the manner prescribed by law.
On May 5, 1908, the defendant filed a motion in said court asking that the plaintiffs be required to file copies of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Collins v. GaucheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cobb v. TrammellSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Muñiz v. "El Zenit,"Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1919
- Ana María Sugar Co. v. CarloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1917
- Caine v. LunonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.