State Ex Rel. Henson v. West Virginia Department of Transportation
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentStarcher, Justice
(Filed July 17, 1998)
I disagree with the majority’s opinion that the Hensons failed to meet the requirements necessary for a writ of mandamus to be issued. The majority is correct in reiterating that the appropriate recourse for property owners, whose property is damaged by the Department of Transportation (“DOT”), is to compel eminent domain proceedings by filing a petition for a writ of mandamus against the DOT.1
The majority opinion rests on the-Hensons’ failure to introduce evidence to “establish a set of facts that show that the appellee has taken or damaged their property....” 203 W.Va.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Griggs v. GraneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RitchieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. French v. State Road CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- G.M. McCrossin, Inc. v. West Virginia Board of RegentsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Phoenix Insurance Company v. RitchieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.