Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Lockhart
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided October 28, 1986No. Nos. PB-C-84-331, PB-C-85-601Published
1Opinion of the Court
*892ORDER
ROY, District Judge.
The Court has carefully considered the Objections filed by the Respondent, and concludes that the Magistrate’s Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be and are hereby adopted. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be and is hereby granted. The Respondent has forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order within which to retry the Petitioner or release him from custody. Thereafter, the writ should issue.
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Filed Oct. 28, 1986
JOHN J. FORSTER, Jr., United States Magistrate.
The Petitioner, Jimmy Lee Hudson, is an inmate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Lewis C. Wallace v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.