Legal Opinion

Southard v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 23793PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

This is a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to the provisions of Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A.1 *457Plaintiff contends that defendant wilfully filed false answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories. Plaintiff requests, therefore, that judgment in his favor be entered in this case.

We conclude, from a study of the interrogatories and answers in issue here and from oral argument by the attorneys, that the defendant answered in good faith, intending neither to mislead plaintiff nor to withhold information requested by plaintiff. We do think, however, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stom v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Black Panther Party v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Michael J. Badalamenti v. Dunham's, Inc., Kinney Shoe Corporation, and Hyde Athletic Industries, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Taggart v. Vermont Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Wembley, Inc. v. Diplomat Tie CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  5. McBroom v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API