Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Quinlan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1994No. 699Published

1DissentPopovich, Judge

Unlike the Majority, I do not find that the revocation of the appellant’s probation and imposition of sentence are violative of the Double Jeopardy clause, and, as a consequence, the denial of the appellant’s Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition should be affirmed.

The facts are not in dispute and reveal that the appellant pleaded guilty to eighteen counts of forgery and was sentenced as follows:

At Docket No. 457 of 1988, Count II, a term of incarceration of eleven and one-half to twenty-three months, to run concurrent with the sentence imposed at Docket No. 263 of 1988, Count I, and a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Commonwealth v. BurdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Gagnon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API