Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Killen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1933No. Appeal 8PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The plaintiff was injured by the negligent operation of an automobile belonging to defendant, which was being driven by her minor son, on his way home from work.

Defendant is a divorced woman, who, at the time, carried on a hair dressing establishment. Her son, eighteen years old, lived with her and was employed by the Sun Oil Co. at its plant about five miles from their home. The defendant received all of her son’s wages.

The automobile belonged to her and was used principally to take her and her son to their respective places of business and bring them home; mostly, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moon v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Raub v. DonnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Kunkle v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Fox v. CahorowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mazi v. McANLISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Bonner v. SurmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Signode Steel Strapping Co. v. Raling, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API