Legal Opinion

Glamann v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 9, 1987No. 85-2266PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Carl Anderson and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company appeal from a judgment in favor of Carol Glamann in this legal malpractice action. The jury found that Anderson negligently failed to pursue Glamann’s employment discrimination claim against her former employer, Command Performance, a hairstyling salon, and awarded her $2,200 in lost wages. The trial court granted Gla-mann’s post-verdict motion to increase the award to $14,388 and added prejudgment interest and reasonable attorney fees.1 We conclude that credible evidence supports the jury’s discrimination determina*645tion, but that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BaculisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Park Bank-West v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Glamann v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Scholmer ex rel. Bye v. PerinaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API