Legal Opinion
Gruida v. Giller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 2, 1962No. Appeals, 380, 381, 432, 433, 434 and 435PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
■ The wife plaintiff, Anna S. Guida, a pedestrian, was struck by an automobile at the intersection of 61st Street and Buist Avenue in the city of Philadelphia. Claiming that the injuries she suffered in the accident were caused by the careless operation of the automobile, she and her husband, Ralph Guida, instituted an action for the recovery of damages. Named as defendants were: (1) the operator of the automobile, Sidney Giller; (2) Morgan’s Home Equipment Corporation; and (3) Modern .Auto Leasing Corporation. It was alleged in the complaint that Giller was an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Segriff v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Rogan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Felski v. ZeidmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Centre Concrete Co. v. AGI, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Appeal of Auditors v. KomaneckyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Suckling v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.