Legal Opinion

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports

Decided March 9, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

Carl E. Mooradian, Esq. Corporation Counsel, Niagara Falls

You have asked whether your "second-class" city may supersede section42 of the Second Class Cities Law in order to provide a heavier fine or imprisonment than is authorized by that section, which limits the penalty for violating an ordinance to $150 or 150 days, or both. This section has been held to preclude cumulative penalties for a continuing violation (People ex rel. LoRusso v Briary Imp. Corp.,77 Misc.2d 797 [App Term, 2d Dept, 1973], affd 34 N.Y.2d 788 [1974]).

Section 4 of the Second Class Cities Law provides that it applies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. In re GrenfellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  5. People v. Briary Improvement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API