Informal Opinion No.
New York Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Carl E. Mooradian, Esq. Corporation Counsel, Niagara Falls
You have asked whether your "second-class" city may supersede section42 of the Second Class Cities Law in order to provide a heavier fine or imprisonment than is authorized by that section, which limits the penalty for violating an ordinance to $150 or 150 days, or both. This section has been held to preclude cumulative penalties for a continuing violation (People ex rel. LoRusso v Briary Imp. Corp.,77 Misc.2d 797 [App Term, 2d Dept, 1973], affd 34 N.Y.2d 788 [1974]).
Section 4 of the Second Class Cities Law provides that it applies…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re GrenfellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- People v. Briary Improvement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.